Beneficial owner conference: absolute regulation disrupts absolutely
31 January 2013 New Orleans
Image: Shutterstock
The IMN Beneficial Owners’ International Securities Lending Conference in New Orleans kicked off with a panel on the five issues that beneficial owners need to focus on in the current regulatory and economic climate.
Regulation dominated the panel’s update for beneficial owners—and the conference overall—with Mark Payson of Brown Brothers Harriman saying that securities finance is in “pretty good shape”, but regulations are negatively affecting the financial services industry as a whole.
Paul Wilson of J.P. Morgan pointed to Basel III capital requirements and Rule 165(e) of the US Dodd-Frank Act as particular concerns for beneficial owners. He said that indemnification could look very different if the rules go through as they currently stand. Bill Kelly of BNY Mellon agreed, saying that “the cost of this service is only going to increase”.
But Jason Peter Strofs of BlackRock was more positive. He said that the relevant regulators are receiving lots of feedback and “seem to be listening. He is “pretty optimistic that the rules will change”.
A panel highlighting specific regulations followed, and the US SEC, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and Federal Reserve Bank of New York were all represented, although disclaimers made it clear that the panel members’ views were their own.
Explaining where her agency is coming from when it looks at securities finance, Theresa Hajost said that the US SEC is a market regulator that cares most about investor protection, rather than systemic risk, which is the mandate of the Financial Stability Board (FSB).
She said that “people are very concerned about the consistency of regulations”. Indeed, her agency is keen to avoid creating regulatory arbitrage opportunities.
When securities lending was first practiced, definitive agreements between counterparties that are common today were not used, according to a panel of experts looking at the practical applications of regulations.
Moderator Tim D'Arcy of SunGard Astec Analytics used this to stress that the industry should not be afraid of new regulations. “We shouldn’t look at regulation as a negative or as the end of the world as we know it.”
The panel took an in-depth look at the industry’s drive towards greater transparency, with Anita Ryan of eSecLending saying: “We’ve come so far with transparency as an industry, but more regulation is coming.”
Ryan pointed to the US SEC’s mandate to encourage more transparency in the industry and the FSB’s proposals, which include the possibility of using surveys and trade repositories to make markets less opaque, as evidence to back up her prediction.
The FSB in particular wants a host of data sets, including the amount on loan, asset class, and the number of custodians used, to be reported in a bid to make the securities finance industry more transparent.
Anthony Toscano of Deutsche Bank said that his firm already shows all of the FSB’s desired data sets, but D'Arcy stressed caution, saying: “Don’t always think more is better.”
He said that beneficial owners do not need to insist on receiving daily reports with all of this information from their agent lenders if they look at or use it once a month.
A panel of representatives from prominent beneficial owners, including the State of Louisiana Department of the Treasury and Franklin Templeton, looked at how to earn revenue in a risk-adjusted fashion.
John Broussard of the State of Louisiana Department of the Treasury said that an important lesson to be learned from the financial crisis of 2008 is that markets are changing—quickly and constantly—and they need to look at different ways to earn revenue as a result.
“It is inconceivable that you can just stick your head in the sand and say this is what we’re always going to do and we’re never going to do anything different. Even for [a beneficial owner] as conservative as we are and as historically tied to one programme as we are, [we need] to test the waters elsewhere to see if what we’re doing is right for us and whether there’s anything better out there.”
“It’s inconceivable that I could sit here and say we’re just going to do it one way from now on, and I don’t think anybody could say that. I think the game is changing constantly and it’s changing quicker now than it ever has.”
Cash reinvestment came under the microscope in another panel. Markit Securities Finance’s David Carruthers said that there is a preponderance of non-cash in US-domiciled funds, and this trend is likely to continue.
While cash remains king, it is important that market players practice collateral flexibility, because it is “good for the health of your programme”, said Carruthers.
Regulation dominated the panel’s update for beneficial owners—and the conference overall—with Mark Payson of Brown Brothers Harriman saying that securities finance is in “pretty good shape”, but regulations are negatively affecting the financial services industry as a whole.
Paul Wilson of J.P. Morgan pointed to Basel III capital requirements and Rule 165(e) of the US Dodd-Frank Act as particular concerns for beneficial owners. He said that indemnification could look very different if the rules go through as they currently stand. Bill Kelly of BNY Mellon agreed, saying that “the cost of this service is only going to increase”.
But Jason Peter Strofs of BlackRock was more positive. He said that the relevant regulators are receiving lots of feedback and “seem to be listening. He is “pretty optimistic that the rules will change”.
A panel highlighting specific regulations followed, and the US SEC, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and Federal Reserve Bank of New York were all represented, although disclaimers made it clear that the panel members’ views were their own.
Explaining where her agency is coming from when it looks at securities finance, Theresa Hajost said that the US SEC is a market regulator that cares most about investor protection, rather than systemic risk, which is the mandate of the Financial Stability Board (FSB).
She said that “people are very concerned about the consistency of regulations”. Indeed, her agency is keen to avoid creating regulatory arbitrage opportunities.
When securities lending was first practiced, definitive agreements between counterparties that are common today were not used, according to a panel of experts looking at the practical applications of regulations.
Moderator Tim D'Arcy of SunGard Astec Analytics used this to stress that the industry should not be afraid of new regulations. “We shouldn’t look at regulation as a negative or as the end of the world as we know it.”
The panel took an in-depth look at the industry’s drive towards greater transparency, with Anita Ryan of eSecLending saying: “We’ve come so far with transparency as an industry, but more regulation is coming.”
Ryan pointed to the US SEC’s mandate to encourage more transparency in the industry and the FSB’s proposals, which include the possibility of using surveys and trade repositories to make markets less opaque, as evidence to back up her prediction.
The FSB in particular wants a host of data sets, including the amount on loan, asset class, and the number of custodians used, to be reported in a bid to make the securities finance industry more transparent.
Anthony Toscano of Deutsche Bank said that his firm already shows all of the FSB’s desired data sets, but D'Arcy stressed caution, saying: “Don’t always think more is better.”
He said that beneficial owners do not need to insist on receiving daily reports with all of this information from their agent lenders if they look at or use it once a month.
A panel of representatives from prominent beneficial owners, including the State of Louisiana Department of the Treasury and Franklin Templeton, looked at how to earn revenue in a risk-adjusted fashion.
John Broussard of the State of Louisiana Department of the Treasury said that an important lesson to be learned from the financial crisis of 2008 is that markets are changing—quickly and constantly—and they need to look at different ways to earn revenue as a result.
“It is inconceivable that you can just stick your head in the sand and say this is what we’re always going to do and we’re never going to do anything different. Even for [a beneficial owner] as conservative as we are and as historically tied to one programme as we are, [we need] to test the waters elsewhere to see if what we’re doing is right for us and whether there’s anything better out there.”
“It’s inconceivable that I could sit here and say we’re just going to do it one way from now on, and I don’t think anybody could say that. I think the game is changing constantly and it’s changing quicker now than it ever has.”
Cash reinvestment came under the microscope in another panel. Markit Securities Finance’s David Carruthers said that there is a preponderance of non-cash in US-domiciled funds, and this trend is likely to continue.
While cash remains king, it is important that market players practice collateral flexibility, because it is “good for the health of your programme”, said Carruthers.
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Securities Finance Times
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Securities Finance Times
