Home   News   Features   Interviews   Magazine Archive   Symposium   Industry Awards  
Subscribe
Securites Lending Times logo
Leading the Way

Global Securities Finance News and Commentary
≔ Menu
Securites Lending Times logo
Leading the Way

Global Securities Finance News and Commentary
News by section
Subscribe
⨂ Close
  1. Home
  2. Industry news
  3. Naked short selling case could go to federal court
Industry news

Naked short selling case could go to federal court


28 May 2013 New Jersey
Reporter: Mark Dugdale

Generic business image for news article
Image: Shutterstock
The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit will decide whether a case alleging Merrill Lynch & Co, Knight Capital Americas, UBS Securities and others engaged in manipulative naked short selling should be heard in state or federal court.

US district judge Jose Linares granted an interlocutory appeal on 23 May in a case that saw shareholders in Escala Group accuse the financial institutions of selling Escala stock that they did not own or borrow.

They filed the case in May 2012 in the Superior Court of New Jersey, but after they amended their complaint, the defendants removed it to the US District Court for the District of New Jersey in July.

The defendants argued that the change of jurisdiction was correct because the plaintiffs’ claims arise under US federal law.

The shareholders in Escala Group contested the change of jurisdiction, but their motion was denied in March, leading them to appeal against the decision.

In granting the Third Circuit appeal on 23 May, district judge Linares said that the case met the criteria for an interlocutory appeal, particularly because “an immediate appeal may ultimately advance the termination of the litigation”.

In his decision, judge Linares said: “There is little doubt that if the Court of Appeals determines that this court lacks jurisdiction, the case will be remanded to the Superior Court of New Jersey and the federal litigation will be terminated. On the other hand, denial of the instant motion could result in a needless waste of time and resources on the part of the court as well as the parties if this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.”

The specific question that the Third Circuit must consider is: “Whether this court has subject matter jurisdiction over the instant matter by virtue of either of the following: (1) Section 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and/or (2) plaintiffs’ claims raise, and arise under, federal law.”

A spokesperson for UBS Securities declined to comment.

Merrill Lynch & Co and Knight Capital Americas are yet to respond to requests for comment.
Next industry article →

KPMG selects SunGard’s Adaptiv Analytics
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Securities Finance Times
Advertisement
Subscribe today
Knowledge base

Explore our extensive directory to find all the essential contacts you need

Visit our directory →
Glossary terms in this article
→ Naked Short Selling

Discover definitions, explanations and related news articles in our glossary

Visit our glossary →