Home   News   Features   Interviews   Magazine Archive   Symposium   Industry Awards  
Subscribe
Securites Lending Times logo
Leading the Way

Global Securities Finance News and Commentary
≔ Menu
Securites Lending Times logo
Leading the Way

Global Securities Finance News and Commentary
News by section
Subscribe
⨂ Close
  1. Home
  2. Industry news
  3. IMN Austin: beneficial owners slow to change
Industry news

IMN Austin: beneficial owners slow to change


28 January 2014 Austin
Reporter: Georgina Lavers

Generic business image for news article
Image: Shutterstock
Technology and legal requirements have come on in leaps and bounds since the 1990s, but beneficial owners are not taking advantage of new processes available to them, according to panellists at the IMN conference.

The first panel of the 20th Beneficial Owners' International Securities Lending Conference in Austin went back to the 1990s, with Mark Payson of Brown Brothers Harriman explaining how the decade saw the rise of the specials market, and many large fund companies driving the securities lending product to the forefront of the market.

Craig Starble of eSecLending agreed that this was when lending shifted from the back office to the front, and business became more akin to an investment product.

Susan Peters of Scorpeo Asset Management reminisced about the days when contracts were often just one page: there were no accounting rules; and indemnification was achieved by simply saying one was. But, she added, things have changed for the better. Large lenders that had the resources to run these programmes began to develop their own risk methodologies, and now there is better risk allocation and better legal definition of how the process works.

But the most reluctant to change were the beneficial owners. Payson said that despite the industry having more products and more participants, there are still owners that are choosing options that are conservative, and "a little outdated".

Moving towards 2000, John Arnesen of BNP Paribas Securities Services, moderator of the discussion, asked panellists to specify the significant timings when technology began to really make a difference.

James Templeman of BlackRock indicated that it was in 2002 when things really began to hot up, what with the advent of EquiLend and its AutoBorrow solution. "Clearly, technology provided scale. Hedge funds were growing rapidly, and the industry collectively realised technology had to keep up. We had no real operational automation behind the scenes. EquiLend's AutoBorrow changed the complexion of the trading desk ... its advent took a lot of heavy lifting away from the traders.”
← Previous industry article

IMN Austin: triparty change calling
Next industry article →

A good year for State Street
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Securities Finance Times
Advertisement
Subscribe today
Knowledge base

Companies in this article
→ BNP Paribas
→ eSecLending
→ EquiLend

Explore our extensive directory to find all the essential contacts you need

Visit our directory →
Glossary terms in this article
→ Hedge
→ Indemnification
→ Specials

Discover definitions, explanations and related news articles in our glossary

Visit our glossary →