Home   News   Features   Interviews   Magazine Archive   Symposium   Industry Awards  
Subscribe
Securites Lending Times logo
Leading the Way

Global Securities Finance News and Commentary
≔ Menu
Securites Lending Times logo
Leading the Way

Global Securities Finance News and Commentary
News by section
Subscribe
⨂ Close
  1. Home
  2. Industry news
  3. Lawyer arrested in connection with ‘cum-ex’ investigations
Industry news

Lawyer arrested in connection with ‘cum-ex’ investigations


13 July 2021 Switzerland
Reporter: Bob Currie

Generic business image for news article
Image: rachid amrous/adobe.stock.com
Hanno Berger, a German lawyer accused of being involved in ‘cum-ex’ tax infringements, has been arrested, according to Swiss authorities.

He was detained in the Swiss canton of Grison following an extradition request from Germany, according to the Swiss Ministry of Justice.

Berger has denied wrongdoing and a legal representative, speaking on Berger’s behalf, said that he opposes extradition to Germany.

German authorities have estimated that cum-ex fraud has cost the country’s exchequer close to €10 billion in lost tax revenue.

According to law firm Rahman Ravelli, multiple European countries have been impacted by this practice, with upwards of €55 billion lost to treasury departments across more than 10 countries.

In February, the UK Financial Conduct Authority said that it is investigating eight individuals for cum-ex tax infringements.

In March 2020, two UK bank employees were handed suspended prison sentences in connection with their role in cum-ex trading in Germany. One of these traders was also given a €14 million fine.

In June, a former senior employee of German private bank MM Warburg was sentenced to more than five years in prison, becoming the first individual to be jailed in connection with cum-ex fraud.

Cum-ex refers to a method used to enable multiple parties to claim a refund on withholding tax paid on a share dividend.

The practice was most prevalent between 2005 and 2012, when rules were tightened to eliminate tax advantages that could be gained through dividend arbitrage.

The practice involved exploiting anomalies in rules governing share trading and withholding tax (WHT) reclamation, which enabled traders to generate virtual dividends through short sale of the stock. This triggered a tax rebate voucher, allowing the holder to reclaim WHT which had never been paid.

In practice, banks and brokers rapidly traded shares with dividend entitlement (cum) and without dividend (ex), enabling them to hide the identity of the actual owner while giving the impression that the share had multiple owners, each entitled to a tax reclaim.
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Securities Finance Times
Advertisement
Subscribe today
Knowledge base

Explore our extensive directory to find all the essential contacts you need

Visit our directory →
Glossary terms in this article
→ Dividend
→ Short Sale
→ Withholding Tax
→ Arbitrage

Discover definitions, explanations and related news articles in our glossary

Visit our glossary →