Home   News   Features   Interviews   Magazine Archive   Symposium   Industry Awards  
Subscribe
Securites Lending Times logo
Leading the Way

Global Securities Finance News and Commentary
≔ Menu
Securites Lending Times logo
Leading the Way

Global Securities Finance News and Commentary
News by section
Subscribe
⨂ Close
  1. Home
  2. Industry news
  3. SEC proposals to increase transparency in proxy voting for investment managers
Industry news

SEC proposals to increase transparency in proxy voting for investment managers


30 September 2021 US
Reporter: Carmella Haswell

Generic business image for news article
Image: Aliaksandr_Marko/stock.adobe.com
The Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed changes to how investment managers report their proxy votes.

During a commission meeting, SEC chair Gary Gensler introduced two main recommendations; firstly, managers should report their votes on executive compensation matters to investors on Form N-PX; and secondly, amendments should be made to Form N-PX to enhance the information mutual funds, exchange-traded funds and others funds report about their proxy votes.

The proposed rulemaking will require funds to tie the description of each voting matter to the issuer’s form of proxy and to categorise each matter by type to help investors identify votes of interest and compare voting records.

It will also prescribe how funds organise their reports and require them to use a structured data language to make the filings easier to analyse, not to mention disclosing how their securities lending activity impacted their voting.

Further, the current proposals will require institutional investment managers to disclose how they voted on executive compensation, or so-called “say-on-pay” matters, which would fulfil one of the remaining rulemaking mandates under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

Form N-PX was first adopted nearly two decades ago and its basic principle was to inform investors how funds voted shares held on their behalf, also known as voting proxies.
The changes have come as a result of investors' concerns surrounding the lack of readily usable information.

Gensler goes on to identify several issues surrounding Form N-PX which include; excessive length of filings; inconsistent reports on votes of the same matter from fund to fund; vague descriptions of votes; and lack of machine-readable format, which prevents investors from downloading information to spreadsheets, making it harder to analyse data.

The public comment period for these recommendations will remain open for 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Securities Finance Times
Advertisement
Subscribe today
Knowledge base

Explore our extensive directory to find all the essential contacts you need

Visit our directory →
Glossary terms in this article
→ Proxy

Discover definitions, explanations and related news articles in our glossary

Visit our glossary →