IOSCO Money Market Fund reforms address NAVs
11 October 2012 Madrid
Image: Shutterstock
The International Organization of Securities Commission (IOSCO) has published a final report on policy recommendations for Money Market Funds, with the board’s approval met during its meeting on 3-4 October in Madrid.
While it was noted that a majority of the commissioners of the US Securities and Exchange Commission did not support its publication, there have been no other objection.
The MMF industry represents approximately $4.7 trillion in assets under management at Q12012 and around one fifth of the assets of Collective Investment Schemes (CIS) worldwide.
“Although money market funds, which provide a significant source of credit and liquidity, did not cause the crisis, their performance during the 2007-2008 financial turmoil highlighted their potential to spread or even amplify a crisis,” said a statement from IOSCO.
As requested by the FSB, the current 15 recommendations for MMFs seek to supplement the existing frameworks where IOSCO considers there is still room for further reforms and improvements, following reforms undertaken on MMFs both in the United States and in Europe in 2010. Other reforms were also adopted in countries such as Canada, China, India and South Africa.
Compared to the 2010 reforms, which mainly focused on the asset side of funds, the present recommendations address vulnerabilities arising from the liability side, as well as the valuation and the display of a constant net asset value (CNAV). In particular, the IOSCO recommendations seek to address the vulnerabilities around the risk of run and first mover advantage.
The implementation of the recommendations may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, depending on local conditions and circumstances, as well as according to the specificities of the existing domestic legal and regulatory structures.
“All the recommendations are important for the safety and robustness of the MMF industry. However, the implementation of some recommendations may need to be phased in, in order to avoid disruptive impacts on the MMF industry and the functioning of the financial system at large,” said IOSCO.
IOSCO proposes to conduct a review of the application of these recommendations within two years with a view to assess whether the recommendations should be revised, complemented or strengthened. At this time, IOSCO will also consider other market or regulatory developments which may have impacted money market funds over this period.
These may include the impact of new banking regulations and the evolution in the structure of bank funding, potential upcoming regulatory reforms in relation to the “shadow banking” system, the interest rate environment, changes in the industry of MMFs, changes in investor demand and the potential development of competing products.
While it was noted that a majority of the commissioners of the US Securities and Exchange Commission did not support its publication, there have been no other objection.
The MMF industry represents approximately $4.7 trillion in assets under management at Q12012 and around one fifth of the assets of Collective Investment Schemes (CIS) worldwide.
“Although money market funds, which provide a significant source of credit and liquidity, did not cause the crisis, their performance during the 2007-2008 financial turmoil highlighted their potential to spread or even amplify a crisis,” said a statement from IOSCO.
As requested by the FSB, the current 15 recommendations for MMFs seek to supplement the existing frameworks where IOSCO considers there is still room for further reforms and improvements, following reforms undertaken on MMFs both in the United States and in Europe in 2010. Other reforms were also adopted in countries such as Canada, China, India and South Africa.
Compared to the 2010 reforms, which mainly focused on the asset side of funds, the present recommendations address vulnerabilities arising from the liability side, as well as the valuation and the display of a constant net asset value (CNAV). In particular, the IOSCO recommendations seek to address the vulnerabilities around the risk of run and first mover advantage.
The implementation of the recommendations may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, depending on local conditions and circumstances, as well as according to the specificities of the existing domestic legal and regulatory structures.
“All the recommendations are important for the safety and robustness of the MMF industry. However, the implementation of some recommendations may need to be phased in, in order to avoid disruptive impacts on the MMF industry and the functioning of the financial system at large,” said IOSCO.
IOSCO proposes to conduct a review of the application of these recommendations within two years with a view to assess whether the recommendations should be revised, complemented or strengthened. At this time, IOSCO will also consider other market or regulatory developments which may have impacted money market funds over this period.
These may include the impact of new banking regulations and the evolution in the structure of bank funding, potential upcoming regulatory reforms in relation to the “shadow banking” system, the interest rate environment, changes in the industry of MMFs, changes in investor demand and the potential development of competing products.
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Securities Finance Times
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Securities Finance Times
