Don't tighten reins on collateral, warns ICMA
03 April 2014 Brussels
Image: Shutterstock
ICMA’s European Repo Council has called for regulators to consider the impact of financial regulation on the movement of collateral, highlighting the potential systemic risks of inhibiting collateral fluidity and the negative impact this could have on the stability and efficiency of capital markets.
In its recent paper, ‘Collateral is the new cash: the systemic risks of inhibiting collateral fluidity’, the council describes the increasing importance of collateral and how it effectively underpins the functioning of capital markets which provide the basis for economic growth.
“This paper will fuel constructive dialogue between the industry and its regulators and help market participants understand the interdependencies at work in the use of collateral, the cumulative effect of different regulatory proposals on its availability, and its role in the functioning of the financial system and in supporting economic growth,” said Godfried De Vidts, chair of ICMA’s European Repo Council.
“As we build the framework of new financial regulation for safer markets we should steer clear of embedding systemic risks which could contribute to future financial crises’.”
The paper highlights that much of Europe still suffers from largely fragmented, pre-euro legacy infrastructures with many barriers to efficient cross- border settlement. New market infrastructure is needed to ensure collateral can flow freely. There are initiatives under way, for example TARGET2-Securities and and the Central Securities Depository Regulation (CSDR), which are designed to help resolve these issues and which should take into account the specific needs of the repo market.
Bank funding desks act as intermediaries between providers and users of collateral, thereby ensuring liquid and efficient short term funding markets—and measures such as Basel III affect the ability of bank funding desks to function effectively, said the paper.
Reduced collateral mobility has negative implications for secondary market liquidity, asset price volatility, hedging, trade execution and the pricing and management of risk.
“These in turn dampen GDP growth in the real economy through reduced investment in capital and businesses, higher borrowing costs for governments, increased funding costs for corporates, increased cliff-effect risks for pension and other institutional investment funds, and a greater reliance on central banks to support the markets”.
In its recent paper, ‘Collateral is the new cash: the systemic risks of inhibiting collateral fluidity’, the council describes the increasing importance of collateral and how it effectively underpins the functioning of capital markets which provide the basis for economic growth.
“This paper will fuel constructive dialogue between the industry and its regulators and help market participants understand the interdependencies at work in the use of collateral, the cumulative effect of different regulatory proposals on its availability, and its role in the functioning of the financial system and in supporting economic growth,” said Godfried De Vidts, chair of ICMA’s European Repo Council.
“As we build the framework of new financial regulation for safer markets we should steer clear of embedding systemic risks which could contribute to future financial crises’.”
The paper highlights that much of Europe still suffers from largely fragmented, pre-euro legacy infrastructures with many barriers to efficient cross- border settlement. New market infrastructure is needed to ensure collateral can flow freely. There are initiatives under way, for example TARGET2-Securities and and the Central Securities Depository Regulation (CSDR), which are designed to help resolve these issues and which should take into account the specific needs of the repo market.
Bank funding desks act as intermediaries between providers and users of collateral, thereby ensuring liquid and efficient short term funding markets—and measures such as Basel III affect the ability of bank funding desks to function effectively, said the paper.
Reduced collateral mobility has negative implications for secondary market liquidity, asset price volatility, hedging, trade execution and the pricing and management of risk.
“These in turn dampen GDP growth in the real economy through reduced investment in capital and businesses, higher borrowing costs for governments, increased funding costs for corporates, increased cliff-effect risks for pension and other institutional investment funds, and a greater reliance on central banks to support the markets”.
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Securities Finance Times
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Securities Finance Times
