ISDA: ‘Not a lot of time’ to prepare for US Treasury reforms
09 August 2024 US
![Generic business image for news article](https://www.securitiesfinancetimes.com/securitieslendingnews/images/FridayAugust920241723197207.jpg)
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) revealed that there is an “enormous laundry list of tasks” that need to be worked through when it comes to the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Treasury reforms.
These tasks, which include the development of documentation and the recalibration of certain capital rules, will require time and a collective effort from the entire industry, says Scott O’Malia, ISDA CEO.
The SEC finalised its regulations on US Treasury reforms in December 2023, which includes a requirement to clear certain Treasury cash transactions from 31 December 2025 and Treasury repos from 30 June 2026.
“There’s an awful lot to do and not a lot of time to do it,” says O’Malia.
In his published opinion on the subject, O’Malia indicates that market participants will need to assess existing and future clearing models to determine which best suits their needs.
In addition, legal documentation will need to be developed, negotiated and executed, and regulatory-compliant structures for the segregation of client margin will need to be put in place and tested.
He adds: “All of this work comes against a backdrop of concern about the need to maintain and enhance market liquidity, particularly during periods of stress.”
Solving legal and operational issues will be critical, says O’Malia, who also highlights the significance of calibrating the US prudential framework to make it risk appropriate and able to support market liquidity.
For example, O’Malia indicates a lack of recognition in the revised US capital framework for cross-margining programmes, such as the one offered by the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (FICC) and CME Group for transactions based on US Treasury securities and interest rate futures.
These services allow firms to obtain initial margin efficiencies from offsetting trades in a portfolio of transactions, but O’Malia believes there are no commensurate benefits from a capital perspective under the standardised approach for counterparty credit risk.
He states: “As more Treasury securities and repos are cleared as a result of the SEC’s rule, a lack of recognition for cross-margining will constrain bank balance sheets and limit their ability to offer client clearing.”
ISDA has worked alongside SIFMA to propose a number of calibration changes to the Basel III Endgame proposals and the surcharge for global systemically important banks (G-SIBS), to ensure the rules do not disproportionately hamper the ability of banks to act as intermediaries.
Furthermore, the association has sent a letter to US prudential regulators drawing attention to non-risk-based supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) and how, in ISDA’s view, it may impede banks’ capacity to participate in US Treasury markets and facilitate access to cleared markets, especially during periods of stress.
In his conclusion, O’Malia says: “All of these issues need to be resolved before we’re in a position to implement Treasury clearing safely and efficiently.
“The question is whether they can be completed in the time available, and this is something we’ll be discussing with members in the coming months.”
These tasks, which include the development of documentation and the recalibration of certain capital rules, will require time and a collective effort from the entire industry, says Scott O’Malia, ISDA CEO.
The SEC finalised its regulations on US Treasury reforms in December 2023, which includes a requirement to clear certain Treasury cash transactions from 31 December 2025 and Treasury repos from 30 June 2026.
“There’s an awful lot to do and not a lot of time to do it,” says O’Malia.
In his published opinion on the subject, O’Malia indicates that market participants will need to assess existing and future clearing models to determine which best suits their needs.
In addition, legal documentation will need to be developed, negotiated and executed, and regulatory-compliant structures for the segregation of client margin will need to be put in place and tested.
He adds: “All of this work comes against a backdrop of concern about the need to maintain and enhance market liquidity, particularly during periods of stress.”
Solving legal and operational issues will be critical, says O’Malia, who also highlights the significance of calibrating the US prudential framework to make it risk appropriate and able to support market liquidity.
For example, O’Malia indicates a lack of recognition in the revised US capital framework for cross-margining programmes, such as the one offered by the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (FICC) and CME Group for transactions based on US Treasury securities and interest rate futures.
These services allow firms to obtain initial margin efficiencies from offsetting trades in a portfolio of transactions, but O’Malia believes there are no commensurate benefits from a capital perspective under the standardised approach for counterparty credit risk.
He states: “As more Treasury securities and repos are cleared as a result of the SEC’s rule, a lack of recognition for cross-margining will constrain bank balance sheets and limit their ability to offer client clearing.”
ISDA has worked alongside SIFMA to propose a number of calibration changes to the Basel III Endgame proposals and the surcharge for global systemically important banks (G-SIBS), to ensure the rules do not disproportionately hamper the ability of banks to act as intermediaries.
Furthermore, the association has sent a letter to US prudential regulators drawing attention to non-risk-based supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) and how, in ISDA’s view, it may impede banks’ capacity to participate in US Treasury markets and facilitate access to cleared markets, especially during periods of stress.
In his conclusion, O’Malia says: “All of these issues need to be resolved before we’re in a position to implement Treasury clearing safely and efficiently.
“The question is whether they can be completed in the time available, and this is something we’ll be discussing with members in the coming months.”
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Securities Finance Times
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Securities Finance Times
![Advertisement](../images/bull-252524.png)